I found Harte’s writing style in Roaring Camp to be intensely interesting and mildly annoying. Okay, maybe it was intensely annoying
too…but as an observing narrator displaced from the real-time of the events he
is relating, he seemed to be presuming quite a bit about the events he
discusses and the people involved in them. For example, right from the start when we are introduced to
our first developed character, Cherokee Sal, the first thing we learn about her
is that “she was a coarse and, it is to be feared, a very sinful woman.” That sounds very suspiciously more like
a personal opinion than a measurable reality to me. It also interested me how Harte portrayed his
characters…they all came across as very down low, primitive, uneducated people,
which certainly might be expected of the pioneers living on the frontier of
civilization, not to mention the pilgrims of America. We see this in dialogue like “see what you kin do. You’ve had experience in them
things.” So that all may be fine
and good and go down in my mind as realistic and well-written dialogue given
the context, but it directly contradicted with his own writing style so much so
that it made the reading process a bit abrasive. Let me elaborate on that…dropping fancy words like “climes,”
“putative,” and “extempore” right after such unsophisticated, meat-and-potatoes
dialogue and the introduction of characters named “Kentuck” and “Stumpy” can
only have one possible motivation written all over it…the guy is trying to
sound sophisticated. And trying
much too hard, in much too inappropriate of a context. Aye, there’s the rub for me that I
alluded to earlier…in Roaring Camp,
Harte’s writing just seems so abrasively self-contradictive. It just doesn’t do to take one of the
most unsophisticated subjects imaginable and try to embellish as many bells and
whistles of sophistication as humanly possible. Maybe he’s just trying to be taken seriously…but as I
scratch my head over this, I just can’t bring myself to take him as anything
but another pretentious author who thought he really had something in
nothing. Granted, though, it
certainly doesn’t help his case that there are literally millions more of those
now than there were when Harte was taking pen to paper. Yes, pen to paper…not finger to
keyboard.
I do tend to agree with your assessment of Harte tossing about personal opinions, particularly in regards to Cherokee Sal. The more I ponder what you wrote and what Harte did as well, I find it conceivable that perhaps this short story is some sort of spin off of what Harte experienced. Maybe this short story was indicative of something he experienced that weighed heavy on his mind as he wrote.
ReplyDeleteI defiantly think this story is a reflection of Harte's personal life.
ReplyDeleteI think Luck allegorically represent luck. People of the time would have been superstitious and maybe Harte wrote this story as a way to show that ultimately luck means nothing and can be taken away at any time.